Delhi Court Acquits Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in Sexual Harassment Case
A Delhi court has acquitted former Wrestling Federation of India president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and former assistant secretary Vinod Tomar of sexual harassment charges. The court ruled that the allegations were false, fabricated, and appeared to be politically motivated, citing a lack of evidence and material contradictions in the prosecution's case. The wrestlers involved in the case have indicated they intend to challenge the acquittal.
7 paksh7 articles
What Happened
A Delhi court acquitted former Wrestling Federation of India president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and former assistant secretary Vinod Tomar on August 3. The court concluded that the sexual harassment allegations brought against them were false and fabricated. The judge observed that the case appeared to be politically motivated and suggested that the accusations were rehearsed and planned. The court also noted that two wrestlers who were central to the charges turned hostile during the proceedings.
The case originated from protests held by wrestlers at Jantar Mantar in 2023. Following the acquittal, the court suggested that a deeper conspiracy might have been behind the allegations, which were reportedly coordinated by wrestlers and coaches at a training centre in Rohtak. The complainants have stated their intention to challenge the court's decision. The trial had lasted for approximately two years before the final verdict was delivered.
Key Facts
- Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and Vinod Tomar were acquitted on August 3.Source not recorded
- The court described the allegations as false, fabricated, and politically motivated.Source not recorded
- Two wrestlers who were key to the prosecution's case turned hostile.Source not recorded
- The court cited material contradictions and a lack of evidence in its ruling.Source not recorded
- The complainants have decided to challenge the acquittal in a higher court.Source not recorded
The Timeline8
Every article on this story, in the order it was filed. We do not rank the outlets.
9 Aug
10 Aug
Show all 8 articlesShow fewer
CoverageWhat we read
Language reach
Dailies carrying this story, against the dailies we read in each language.
- English5 of 9
- Kannadaಕನ್ನಡ1 of 1
- Malayalamമലയാളം1 of 2
Regional reach
Where this story reached, and where it did not. National mastheads and wire agencies circulate everywhere and are counted separately, not drawn on the map.
- None carried this
- No source registered
- 1 outlet
- 2 or more
- NorthNot carried0 of 4
- WestNot carried0 of 5
- Central IndiaNot carried0 of 1
- EastNot carried0 of 5
- North-eastNot carried0 of 2
- SouthCarried3 of 10
2 of the 26 states we read have local coverage. Concentrated in the South. Also carried by 4 national mastheads.
About This Analysis
One summary, built from every source. No single newsroom's voice.
- 7
- Paksh
- 7
- Articles
- 5
- Key facts
Paksh: the sides a story is told from. 7 newsrooms filed on this one, and every filing is listed above.