Skip to content
NewsPaksh

One story from every newsroom

Live

Delhi High Court questions use of Jantar Mantar as protest site

The Delhi High Court on Friday questioned the government on why Jantar Mantar continues to be designated as a protest site in the heart of the capital. During a hearing regarding a petition by the All India Dalit Christian Rights Protection Committee, which sought permission for a peaceful demonstration on August 10, Justice Amit Mahajan remarked that such protests should not hold the city to ransom. The court noted that the decision to permit or relocate protests rests with the government and police authorities.

BhDHDoHTTHTPuSPTOI

8 paksh9 articles

Kamlesh kumar Mishra at Delhi High Court
File photo: Kamlesh.legalaid / CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

What Happened

The Delhi High Court heard a petition filed by the All India Dalit Christian Rights Protection Committee, which requested a directive for the Delhi Police to grant permission for a peaceful protest at Jantar Mantar on August 10. During the proceedings, Justice Amit Mahajan questioned why the government allows the site to function as a hub for demonstrations, suggesting that such activities disrupt the city and its residents. The court emphasized that the responsibility for maintaining law and order and deciding on protest locations lies with the government and police.

The remarks prompted reactions from various groups, including the Cockroach Janta Party, which has previously held long-term protests at the site and expressed opposition to losing access to the location. While the court questioned the suitability of Jantar Mantar, it acknowledged that the final decision regarding the regulation of public spaces remains with the executive branch. The Delhi Police has been tasked with providing clarity on the pending request for the August 10 demonstration.

Key Facts

  1. The Delhi High Court heard a petition from the All India Dalit Christian Rights Protection Committee.Source not recorded
  2. The petitioner sought permission for a peaceful protest at Jantar Mantar on August 10.Source not recorded
  3. Justice Amit Mahajan questioned why Jantar Mantar remains a designated protest site.Source not recorded
  4. The court stated that the decision to allow or relocate protests is a matter for the government and police.Source not recorded
  5. The Cockroach Janta Party expressed opposition to the potential closure of the site for protests.Source not recorded

The Timeline9

Every article on this story, in the order it was filed. We do not rank the outlets.

  1. 7 Aug

Show all 9 articles
  1. 8 Aug

CoverageWhat we read

Language reach

Dailies carrying this story, against the dailies we read in each language.

  • English3 of 9
  • Hindiहिन्दी1 of 2
  • Bengaliবাংলা1 of 2
  • Marathiमराठी1 of 2
  • Tamilதமிழ்1 of 2
  • Malayalamമലയാളം1 of 2

Regional reach

Where this story reached, and where it did not. National mastheads and wire agencies circulate everywhere and are counted separately, not drawn on the map.

Jammu & Kashmir: no registered newsroom carried thisLadakh: no newsroom registered here yetPunjab: Dainik BhaskarChandigarh: no registered newsroom carried thisHimachal Pradesh: no registered newsroom carried thisUttarakhand: no registered newsroom carried thisHaryana: Dainik BhaskarDelhi NCR: no registered newsroom carried thisUttar Pradesh: no registered newsroom carried thisRajasthan: Dainik BhaskarGujarat: Dainik BhaskarDadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu: no registered newsroom carried thisMaharashtra: Dainik Bhaskar, PudhariGoa: PudhariMadhya Pradesh: Dainik BhaskarChhattisgarh: Dainik BhaskarBihar: no registered newsroom carried thisJharkhand: no newsroom registered here yetWest Bengal: Sangbad PratidinOdisha: no registered newsroom carried thisSikkim: no registered newsroom carried thisArunachal Pradesh: no newsroom registered here yetAssam: no registered newsroom carried thisNagaland: no newsroom registered here yetMeghalaya: no newsroom registered here yetManipur: no newsroom registered here yetTripura: no newsroom registered here yetMizoram: no newsroom registered here yetTelangana: no registered newsroom carried thisKarnataka: Deccan Herald, PudhariAndhra Pradesh: no registered newsroom carried thisKerala: DoolnewsTamil Nadu: Hindu Tamil ThisaiPuducherry: Hindu Tamil ThisaiLakshadweep: no newsroom registered here yetAndaman & Nicobar: no newsroom registered here yet
  • None carried this
  • No source registered
  • 1 outlet
  • 2 or more
  • Where the story is
  • NorthCarried1 of 4
  • WestCarried2 of 5
  • Central IndiaCarried1 of 1
  • EastCarried1 of 5
  • North-eastNot carried0 of 2
  • SouthCarried4 of 10

13 of the 26 states we read have local coverage. Spread across the country, with no regional concentration. Also carried by 2 national mastheads.

About This Analysis

One summary, built from every source. No single newsroom's voice.

8
Paksh
9
Articles
5
Key facts

Paksh: the sides a story is told from. 8 newsrooms filed on this one, and every filing is listed above.

Related