Supreme Court dismisses plea for FIR against former judge Yashwant Varma
The Supreme Court of India on Friday rejected a petition seeking the registration of an FIR and a court-monitored investigation into the alleged discovery of cash at the residence of former Allahabad High Court judge Yashwant Varma. A bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe dismissed the plea, which was filed by advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay. The court declined to entertain the matter, noting that a similar petition had been dismissed previously.
2 paksh2 articles
What Happened
A bench of the Supreme Court, consisting of Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe, dismissed a petition on Friday that requested the registration of an FIR and a court-monitored probe regarding an alleged cash recovery at the residence of former Allahabad High Court judge Yashwant Varma. The petitioner, advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay, argued that the former judge should face criminal liability for the unaccounted money despite his resignation from office. Upadhyay contended that his current petition differed from a previously dismissed one because he had now filed a formal complaint.
The court refused to entertain the plea, citing the dismissal of a similar petition in the past. While the petitioner sought to distinguish his current filing from the previous attempt on procedural grounds, the bench maintained its stance against the request. Reports indicate that the court characterized the plea as an attempt to gain cheap publicity.
Key Facts
- The Supreme Court bench was led by Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe.Source not recorded
- The petition sought an FIR and a court-monitored probe into alleged cash found at Yashwant Varma's residence.Source not recorded
- Yashwant Varma is a former judge of the Allahabad High Court.Source not recorded
- The court dismissed the petition on Friday.Source not recorded
- A similar petition regarding the same matter had been dismissed by the court previously.Source not recorded
The Timeline2
Every article on this story, in the order it was filed. We do not rank the outlets.
7 Aug
CoverageWhat we read
Language reach
Dailies carrying this story, against the dailies we read in each language.
- English2 of 9
Regional reach
Where this story reached, and where it did not. National mastheads and wire agencies circulate everywhere and are counted separately, not drawn on the map.
- None carried this
- No source registered
- 1 outlet
- 2 or more
- NorthNot carried0 of 4
- WestNot carried0 of 5
- Central IndiaNot carried0 of 1
- EastNot carried0 of 5
- North-eastNot carried0 of 2
- SouthCarried1 of 10
1 of the 26 states we read have local coverage. Spread across the country, with no regional concentration. Also carried by 1 national masthead.
About This Analysis
One summary, built from every source. No single newsroom's voice.
- 2
- Paksh
- 2
- Articles
- 5
- Key facts
Paksh: the sides a story is told from. 2 newsrooms filed on this one, and every filing is listed above.