Skip to content
NewsPaksh

One story from every newsroom

Live

Centre opposes plea for income-based sub-quotas for SC, ST and OBC categories

The Union government has filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court opposing a petition that seeks to introduce income-based sub-quotas within existing reservation categories for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. The Centre argued that reservation criteria are rooted in historical and social backwardness rather than economic status alone, and maintained that the creamy layer doctrine does not apply to SC and ST groups.

5 paksh

beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime
File photo: Maahid Photos / Unsplash License, via Unsplash

What Happened

The Union government submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court in response to a writ petition filed by Ramashankar Prajapati and other petitioners. The plea requested the implementation of sub-quotas for economically disadvantaged individuals within the existing reservation framework for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. The government rejected the proposal, stating that constitutional reservation policies are based on long-standing factors of social exclusion, historical disadvantage and under-representation.

In its response, the Centre asserted that judicial precedent has consistently limited the creamy layer doctrine to Other Backward Classes. The government further argued that the proposed changes fall outside the court's jurisdiction and that existing welfare schemes already incorporate means tests to ensure benefits reach those in need. The administration maintained that reservation criteria cannot be altered based solely on economic status.

Key Facts

  1. The Centre filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court opposing income-based sub-quotas.
  2. The petition was filed by Ramashankar Prajapati and other applicants.
  3. The government argued that SC and ST reservation is based on historical social disadvantage.
  4. The Centre stated that the creamy layer doctrine does not apply to SC and ST categories.
  5. The government noted that most welfare schemes already include a means test.

The Timeline5

Every article on this story, in the order it was filed. We do not rank the outlets.

  1. 6 Aug

  2. 7 Aug

Where This Is Being Covered2 languages

Languages

Newsrooms carrying this story, by publication language.

  • English4 outlets
  • Bengaliবাংলা1 outlet

Regional reach

States where a local newsroom is carrying this. National mastheads and wire agencies circulate everywhere and are counted separately, not drawn on the map.

Jammu & Kashmir: No local newsroomLadakh: No local newsroomPunjab: No local newsroomChandigarh: No local newsroomHimachal Pradesh: No local newsroomUttarakhand: No local newsroomHaryana: No local newsroomDelhi NCR: No local newsroomUttar Pradesh: No local newsroomRajasthan: No local newsroomGujarat: No local newsroomDadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu: No local newsroomMaharashtra: No local newsroomGoa: No local newsroomMadhya Pradesh: No local newsroomChhattisgarh: No local newsroomBihar: No local newsroomJharkhand: No local newsroomWest Bengal: Sangbad PratidinOdisha: No local newsroomSikkim: No local newsroomArunachal Pradesh: No local newsroomAssam: No local newsroomNagaland: No local newsroomMeghalaya: No local newsroomManipur: No local newsroomTripura: No local newsroomMizoram: No local newsroomTelangana: No local newsroomKarnataka: Deccan HeraldAndhra Pradesh: No local newsroomKerala: No local newsroomTamil Nadu: No local newsroomPuducherry: No local newsroomLakshadweep: No local newsroomAndaman & Nicobar: No local newsroom
  • No local newsroom
  • 1 outlet
  • 2 or more

2 states with local coverage. Spread across the country, with no regional concentration. Also carried by 3 national mastheads.

About This Analysis

One summary, built from every source. No single newsroom's voice.

5
Paksh
4
Articles
5
Key facts

Paksh: the sides a story is told from. 5 newsrooms filed on this one, and every filing is listed above.

Related