Centre opposes plea for income-based sub-quotas for SC, ST and OBC categories
The Union government has filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court opposing a petition that seeks to introduce income-based sub-quotas within existing reservation categories for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. The Centre argued that reservation criteria are rooted in historical and social backwardness rather than economic status alone, and maintained that the creamy layer doctrine does not apply to SC and ST groups.
5 paksh4 articles
What Happened
The Union government submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court in response to a writ petition filed by Ramashankar Prajapati and other petitioners. The plea requested the implementation of sub-quotas for economically disadvantaged individuals within the existing reservation framework for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. The government rejected the proposal, stating that constitutional reservation policies are based on long-standing factors of social exclusion, historical disadvantage and under-representation.
In its response, the Centre asserted that judicial precedent has consistently limited the creamy layer doctrine to Other Backward Classes. The government further argued that the proposed changes fall outside the court's jurisdiction and that existing welfare schemes already incorporate means tests to ensure benefits reach those in need. The administration maintained that reservation criteria cannot be altered based solely on economic status.
Key Facts
- The Centre filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court opposing income-based sub-quotas.Source not recorded
- The petition was filed by Ramashankar Prajapati and other applicants.Source not recorded
- The government argued that SC and ST reservation is based on historical social disadvantage.Source not recorded
- The Centre stated that the creamy layer doctrine does not apply to SC and ST categories.Source not recorded
- The government noted that most welfare schemes already include a means test.Source not recorded
The Timeline5
Every article on this story, in the order it was filed. We do not rank the outlets.
6 Aug
7 Aug
CoverageWhat we read
Language reach
Dailies carrying this story, against the dailies we read in each language.
- English4 of 9
- Bengaliবাংলা1 of 2
Regional reach
Where this story reached, and where it did not. National mastheads and wire agencies circulate everywhere and are counted separately, not drawn on the map.
- None carried this
- No source registered
- 1 outlet
- 2 or more
- NorthNot carried0 of 4
- WestNot carried0 of 5
- Central IndiaNot carried0 of 1
- EastCarried1 of 5
- North-eastNot carried0 of 2
- SouthCarried1 of 10
2 of the 26 states we read have local coverage. Spread across the country, with no regional concentration. Also carried by 3 national mastheads.
About This Analysis
One summary, built from every source. No single newsroom's voice.
- 5
- Paksh
- 4
- Articles
- 5
- Key facts
Paksh: the sides a story is told from. 5 newsrooms filed on this one, and every filing is listed above.