Centre opposes plea for income-based sub-quotas for SC, ST and OBC categories
The Union government has filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court opposing a petition that seeks to introduce income-based sub-quotas within existing reservation categories for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. The Centre argued that reservation criteria are rooted in historical and social backwardness rather than economic status alone, and maintained that the creamy layer doctrine does not apply to SC and ST groups.
5 paksh
What Happened
The Union government submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court in response to a writ petition filed by Ramashankar Prajapati and other petitioners. The plea requested the implementation of sub-quotas for economically disadvantaged individuals within the existing reservation framework for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. The government rejected the proposal, stating that constitutional reservation policies are based on long-standing factors of social exclusion, historical disadvantage and under-representation.
In its response, the Centre asserted that judicial precedent has consistently limited the creamy layer doctrine to Other Backward Classes. The government further argued that the proposed changes fall outside the court's jurisdiction and that existing welfare schemes already incorporate means tests to ensure benefits reach those in need. The administration maintained that reservation criteria cannot be altered based solely on economic status.
Key Facts
- The Centre filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court opposing income-based sub-quotas.
- The petition was filed by Ramashankar Prajapati and other applicants.
- The government argued that SC and ST reservation is based on historical social disadvantage.
- The Centre stated that the creamy layer doctrine does not apply to SC and ST categories.
- The government noted that most welfare schemes already include a means test.
The Timeline5
Every article on this story, in the order it was filed. We do not rank the outlets.
6 Aug
7 Aug
Where This Is Being Covered2 languages
Languages
Newsrooms carrying this story, by publication language.
- English4 outlets
- Bengaliবাংলা1 outlet
Regional reach
States where a local newsroom is carrying this. National mastheads and wire agencies circulate everywhere and are counted separately, not drawn on the map.
- No local newsroom
- 1 outlet
- 2 or more
2 states with local coverage. Spread across the country, with no regional concentration. Also carried by 3 national mastheads.
About This Analysis
One summary, built from every source. No single newsroom's voice.
- 5
- Paksh
- 4
- Articles
- 5
- Key facts
Paksh: the sides a story is told from. 5 newsrooms filed on this one, and every filing is listed above.