Skip to content
NewsPaksh

One story from every newsroom

Live

Supreme Court rejects Mahua Moitra's plea for virtual appearance in police probe

The Supreme Court of India on Friday declined to entertain a petition from Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, who sought permission to join a police investigation via video conferencing. Moitra had challenged a Calcutta High Court order requiring her physical presence for questioning regarding alleged hate speech and provocative social media posts. During the hearing, the bench questioned why an elected representative should seek special exemptions from appearing before local authorities, leading Moitra's counsel to withdraw the plea.

UjBhHTTHTToNaQaSBTOI

9 paksh10 articles

beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime
File photo: Maahid Photos / Unsplash License, via Unsplash

What Happened

Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra appeared before the Supreme Court on Friday to challenge a Calcutta High Court directive that mandated her physical presence for a police investigation. The case stems from allegations of hate speech and provocative social media posts. Moitra's legal counsel, senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, requested that she be permitted to join the interrogation through video conferencing, citing concerns over potential safety risks, including the possibility of being targeted with eggs during her travel to the police station.

The bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu, expressed skepticism toward the request and questioned why an elected representative should be granted special exemptions from standard investigative procedures. During the proceedings, the judges remarked that freedom fighters had faced bullets, questioning why a politician would fear being targeted with eggs. Following the court's clear disinclination to grant the relief, Moitra's counsel sought and received permission to withdraw the petition.

Key Facts

  1. The Supreme Court bench consisted of Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu.Source not recorded
  2. Mahua Moitra sought to join a police investigation via video conferencing.Source not recorded
  3. The investigation relates to alleged hate speech and provocative social media posts.Source not recorded
  4. Moitra's petition challenged a previous order from the Calcutta High Court.Source not recorded
  5. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court's direction.Source not recorded
  6. Moitra's counsel withdrew the petition after the court expressed its stance.Source not recorded

The Timeline11

Every article on this story, in the order it was filed. We do not rank the outlets.

  1. 7 Aug

Show all 11 articles
  1. 8 Aug

CoverageWhat we read

Language reach

Dailies carrying this story, against the dailies we read in each language.

  • English3 of 9
  • Hindiहिन्दी2 of 2
  • Teluguతెలుగు1 of 2
  • Tamilதமிழ்1 of 2
  • Urduاردو1 of 2
  • Odiaଓଡ଼ିଆ1 of 2

Regional reach

Where this story reached, and where it did not. National mastheads and wire agencies circulate everywhere and are counted separately, not drawn on the map.

Jammu & Kashmir: Amar UjalaLadakh: no newsroom registered here yetPunjab: Amar Ujala, Dainik BhaskarChandigarh: no registered newsroom carried thisHimachal Pradesh: Amar UjalaUttarakhand: Amar UjalaHaryana: Amar Ujala, Dainik BhaskarDelhi NCR: Amar Ujala, Qaumi AwazUttar Pradesh: Amar Ujala, Qaumi AwazRajasthan: Dainik BhaskarGujarat: Dainik BhaskarDadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu: no registered newsroom carried thisMaharashtra: Dainik BhaskarGoa: no registered newsroom carried thisMadhya Pradesh: Dainik BhaskarChhattisgarh: Dainik BhaskarBihar: Qaumi AwazJharkhand: no newsroom registered here yetWest Bengal: no registered newsroom carried thisOdisha: SambadSikkim: no registered newsroom carried thisArunachal Pradesh: no newsroom registered here yetAssam: no registered newsroom carried thisNagaland: no newsroom registered here yetMeghalaya: no newsroom registered here yetManipur: no newsroom registered here yetTripura: no newsroom registered here yetMizoram: no newsroom registered here yetTelangana: Namasthe TelanganaKarnataka: no registered newsroom carried thisAndhra Pradesh: no registered newsroom carried thisKerala: no registered newsroom carried thisTamil Nadu: Hindu Tamil ThisaiPuducherry: Hindu Tamil ThisaiLakshadweep: no newsroom registered here yetAndaman & Nicobar: no newsroom registered here yet
  • None carried this
  • No source registered
  • 1 outlet
  • 2 or more
  • NorthCarried3 of 4
  • WestCarried1 of 5
  • Central IndiaCarried1 of 1
  • EastCarried2 of 5
  • North-eastNot carried0 of 2
  • SouthCarried2 of 10

17 of the 26 states we read have local coverage. Spread across the country, with no regional concentration. Also carried by 3 national mastheads.

About This Analysis

One summary, built from every source. No single newsroom's voice.

9
Paksh
10
Articles
6
Key facts

Paksh: the sides a story is told from. 9 newsrooms filed on this one, and every filing is listed above.

Related