Supreme Court rejects Mahua Moitra's plea for virtual appearance in police probe
The Supreme Court of India on Friday declined to entertain a petition from Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, who sought permission to join a police investigation via video conferencing. Moitra had challenged a Calcutta High Court order requiring her physical presence for questioning regarding alleged hate speech and provocative social media posts. During the hearing, the bench questioned why an elected representative should seek special exemptions from appearing before local authorities, leading Moitra's counsel to withdraw the plea.
9 paksh10 articles
What Happened
Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra appeared before the Supreme Court on Friday to challenge a Calcutta High Court directive that mandated her physical presence for a police investigation. The case stems from allegations of hate speech and provocative social media posts. Moitra's legal counsel, senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, requested that she be permitted to join the interrogation through video conferencing, citing concerns over potential safety risks, including the possibility of being targeted with eggs during her travel to the police station.
The bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu, expressed skepticism toward the request and questioned why an elected representative should be granted special exemptions from standard investigative procedures. During the proceedings, the judges remarked that freedom fighters had faced bullets, questioning why a politician would fear being targeted with eggs. Following the court's clear disinclination to grant the relief, Moitra's counsel sought and received permission to withdraw the petition.
Key Facts
- The Supreme Court bench consisted of Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu.
- Mahua Moitra sought to join a police investigation via video conferencing.
- The investigation relates to alleged hate speech and provocative social media posts.
- Moitra's petition challenged a previous order from the Calcutta High Court.
- The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court's direction.
- Moitra's counsel withdrew the petition after the court expressed its stance.
The Timeline11
Every article on this story, in the order it was filed. We do not rank the outlets.
7 Aug
Show all 11 articlesShow fewer
- TOIThe Times of India'Why fear eggs in politics?' SC tells Mauha freedom fighter took bullets to chest
8 Aug
- Nanamasthe-telanganaవారు తూటాలకు ఎదురొడ్డారు.. మీరు గుడ్లకు భయపడతారా?
- TOIThe Times of IndiaSupeme Court to Mahua: Freedom fighters faced bullets, you fear eggs
Where This Is Being Covered6 languages
Languages
Newsrooms carrying this story, by publication language.
- English3 outlets
- Hindiहिन्दी2 outlets
- Teluguతెలుగు1 outlet
- Tamilதமிழ்1 outlet
- Urduاردو1 outlet
- Odiaଓଡ଼ିଆ1 outlet
Regional reach
States where a local newsroom is carrying this. National mastheads and wire agencies circulate everywhere and are counted separately, not drawn on the map.
- No local newsroom
- 1 outlet
- 2 or more
17 states with local coverage. Spread across the country, with no regional concentration. Also carried by 3 national mastheads.
About This Analysis
One summary, built from every source. No single newsroom's voice.
- 9
- Paksh
- 10
- Articles
- 6
- Key facts
Paksh: the sides a story is told from. 9 newsrooms filed on this one, and every filing is listed above.