Delhi High Court stays FSSAI ban on Dabur products over 100 percent claims
The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to Dabur India by staying an FSSAI order that prohibited the sale of certain food products labeled as 100 percent pure, natural, or organic. The court issued a notice to the food regulator, questioning the lack of a prior hearing before the ban was imposed on August 3. The stay remains in effect until the next date of hearing.
7 paksh7 articles
What Happened
The Delhi High Court issued a stay on an FSSAI order that had banned Dabur India from selling various food products, including honey, ghee, and edible oils. The regulator had previously issued a directive on August 3, claiming that the company's marketing labels asserting 100 percent purity or natural ingredients were misleading and unverifiable. Justice Amit Mahajan presided over the matter and issued a notice to the FSSAI to file a response.
The court observed that the regulator had not provided the company with a show-cause notice or an opportunity for a hearing before issuing the prohibition. Justice Mahajan stated that such an order should not be passed without following due process, particularly given that the company has been selling these products for decades. The FSSAI order is suspended until the court conducts further proceedings in the case.
Key Facts
- The Delhi High Court stayed the FSSAI order on Friday.Source not recorded
- The FSSAI had issued its ban directive on August 3.Source not recorded
- The regulator claimed labels like 100 percent pure and 100 percent natural were misleading.Source not recorded
- Justice Amit Mahajan noted that the company was not given a prior hearing.Source not recorded
- The stay allows Dabur to continue selling the affected products until the next hearing.Source not recorded
The Timeline8
Every article on this story, in the order it was filed. We do not rank the outlets.
7 Aug
- ETThe Economic TimesDabur gets court relief in FSSAI ‘100%’ claims row
Show all 8 articlesShow fewer
- PVPrajavaniಡಾಬರ್ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನ ಮಾರಾಟ ನಿರ್ಬಂಧಕ್ಕೆ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ತಡೆ
CoverageWhat we read
Language reach
Dailies carrying this story, against the dailies we read in each language.
- English4 of 9
- Hindiहिन्दी1 of 2
- Bengaliবাংলা1 of 2
- Kannadaಕನ್ನಡ1 of 1
Regional reach
Where this story reached, and where it did not. National mastheads and wire agencies circulate everywhere and are counted separately, not drawn on the map.
- None carried this
- No source registered
- 1 outlet
- 2 or more
- NorthCarried1 of 4
- WestCarried1 of 5
- Central IndiaCarried1 of 1
- EastCarried1 of 5
- North-eastNot carried0 of 2
- SouthCarried1 of 10
9 of the 26 states we read have local coverage. Spread across the country, with no regional concentration. Also carried by 4 national mastheads.
About This Analysis
One summary, built from every source. No single newsroom's voice.
- 7
- Paksh
- 7
- Articles
- 5
- Key facts
Paksh: the sides a story is told from. 7 newsrooms filed on this one, and every filing is listed above.